Data
Provenance, cohort construction, representativeness, missingness, duplicates and potential leakage.
Independent assessment
Before an investment, partnership or validation step, QSTOM-IT examines whether reported performance is supported by the data, reproducible within the accessible scope and consistent with the stated protocol.
Triggers
Scope
Provenance, cohort construction, representativeness, missingness, duplicates and potential leakage.
Target, train/test split, temporality, comparators, metric selection and reproducibility.
Metric calculation, thresholds, calibration, subpopulations, false positives and false negatives.
The gap between observed results and the claims presented to decision makers.
Method
In 7 to 10 business days, the goal is not to reproduce an entire product. We identify the claims that matter most to the decision and look for risks that could materially change their interpretation.
Limits
FAQ
Not necessarily. An initial review can be performed from documentation and the data room. When testing is required, we prefer execution in an environment controlled by the client.
Yes, but the level of conclusion will be limited. We explicitly distinguish what is documented, what has been tested and what could not be verified.
Both are possible, but under different engagement types. Buyer-side due diligence is separated from readiness work commissioned by the company being assessed.
QSTOM-IT
Tell us the priority technical claims, timeline and available access. We will explain what can reasonably be verified within the window.